So that’s what got me confused. I figured you should’ve cloned from /dev/sda to /dev/sdb but apparently you use 2 different OS’ or something along the lines. I’m still a bit confused.
Sorry for the confusion. I showed each disk after it was booted. I assume now you wanted to see them together.
easyt50@x220 ~ $ sudo fdisk -l | grep -A 7 /dev/sd
[sudo] password for easyt50:
Disk /dev/sda: 447.1 GiB, 480103981056 bytes, 937703088 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0001fbea
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 206847 204800 100M 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2 206848 104888384 104681537 49.9G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda3 104888453 937697984 832809532 397.1G f W95 Ext’d (LBA)
/dev/sda5 104888455 115378829 10490375 5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda6 189259776 209018879 19759104 9.4G 83 Linux
/dev/sda7 209021784 308303414 99281631 47.3G 83 Linux
/dev/sda8 308303482 937697984 629394503 300.1G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda9 * 115380224 157372411 41992188 20G 83 Linux
/dev/sda10 157374464 169244671 11870208 5.7G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition table entries are not in disk order.
Disk /dev/sdb: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x32aa285c
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sdb1 * 2048 52436159 52434112 25G 83 Linux
/dev/sdb2 964429822 976771071 12341250 5.9G 5 Extended
/dev/sdb3 52436160 159348734 106912575 51G 83 Linux
/dev/sdb5 964429824 976771071 12341248 5.9G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition table entries are not in disk order.
But doesn’t it show the same together as it does separate?
Ah, now it is shown as expected. I wanted to see the 2 together to clarify the table
better, as it shows cloning parts of a disk to itself, so I suppose there should be a cloning from sda to sdb shown, instead. Anyway, just a minor correction.
Ah, I see why now. But with the CloneZilla USB plugged into my PC when I actually ran the cloning process.
Source was sda,
Clonezilla was sdb,
Target was sdc.
So when running the program, sdc1 and sdc2 was the target names.
Yes, it is just a temporary assignment. Theoretically, you could put in any letter, it does not really matter, as long you pick the one that is actually assigned to the medium. I was just confused, because obviously the same letter usually means it should be the same medium.