We starting to talk percentages? Okay, let’s start talking about that.
For easier calculations, I will treat the 529MB as 0.5GB and my RAM as 48GB, even though it is technically more, if I would be precise, so the result will be in your favour:
0.5GB of 48GB is 1.04% of my total RAM.
Now, this might be an usual amount of RAM – sure. Let’s be more beginner-friendly then.
I could only find a single statistic about the average RAM of computers around the world. It’s showing the average RAM a computer of a Steam user has.
- 30.38% have 8GB RAM in their computer.
- 41.81% have 16GB RAM in their computer.
(As of October 2020)
Most people have 16GB RAM.
Still, let’s be nice and do the calculations in your favour!
We pick the second most widely spread RAM amount!
So, let’s start calculations again…
0.5GB of 8GB is 6.25% of the (almost) average computer’s RAM.
You said
That’s not enough! Let’s bump it up in your favour and let’s say that it uses 50% more than Trisquel! Let’s be nice and do you this favour.
0.25GB of 8GB is 3.13% of the (almost) average computer’s RAM.
Second most widely spread RAM amount
OS |
Total RAM |
Usage |
Trisquel |
8GB |
3.13% |
Mint |
8GB |
6.25% |
Most widely spread RAM amount
OS |
Total RAM |
Usage |
Trisquel |
16GB |
1.56% |
Mint |
16GB |
3.13% |
RAM amount of almost all the people I know personally
OS |
Total RAM |
Usage |
Trisquel |
32GB |
0.78% |
Mint |
32GB |
1.56% |
My RAM amount
OS |
Total RAM |
Usage |
Trisquel |
48GB |
0.52% |
Mint |
48GB |
1.04% |
I don’t know how that look to you, but to me it seems like the average user wouldn’t give a single piece of flying pig shit, if their computer uses 3.13% of their RAM or 6.25% RAM, especially when this average user probably has unnecessary bloat on their computer, so the reduction in RAM you get from Trisquel is already by far outweighed by all the RAM increase that happens through bloating up your computer due to lack of technical knowledge and lack of knowledge regarding the usage of a computer.
If the user is counting peas, then this might be perhaps true. But if those “bloated” distributions help you be more productive and do your work quicker and more efficiently than the ultra-slimmed down Trisquel, than Mint and Ubuntu are actually FASTER! If I can’t do shit with a slimmed down skeleton distribution, then I am losing more time than I gain through the little increase in system performance.
Still, you got me. I did not test foreign distributions since several years, because I grew tired of it a very long time ago. However, all this Trisquel propaganda is so astoundingly one-sided and narrow-minded, that I actually consider trying this one out just to gather every single detail this distribution is not able to handle, while Ubuntu and friends do. I am inclined to gather all these itsy bitsy details, put them in a list and then compare those feature lists with the more popular distributions.
Then I wonder who will win the game after all, when Trisquel will be the slowest in productivity and human interaction performances…