Hi,
In my Linux Mint 19 system:
the sudo du -shc /home/* command output is
16K /home/lost+found
4.0K /home/partimag
59G /home/roger
59G total
But,
the sudo du -shc /home/roger/* command gives a total of only 5.2 G
Where is the difference?
Hi,
In my Linux Mint 19 system:
the sudo du -shc /home/* command output is
16K /home/lost+found
4.0K /home/partimag
59G /home/roger
59G total
But,
the sudo du -shc /home/roger/* command gives a total of only 5.2 G
Where is the difference?
Hi,
Welcome to It’s FOSS Community forum.
Ah! The things you discover when you start playing with Linux.
There is one simple explanation of this: the hidden files and folders.
When you did sudo du -shc /home/*, it showed 3 directories and their sum.
And when you did sudo du -shc /home/roger/*, it probably showed a bunch of directories and files and their sum.
The difference comes from what it sees. When you do /home/roger/, you are listing the contents of the directory first and then calculating its sum. The problem comes from the display because hidden folders won’t be shown in /home/roger/ (you can see the difference by using the ls command option -a).
Since the hidden folders of your home directory was not in the output of /home/roger/*, their directory size was not counted.
The correct way to check the directory size would be to use it like this:
sudo du -shc /home/roger
This way, you are not displaying the contents of the /home/roger directory. Your system will automatically takes into account all the files and folders (even the hidden ones).
I hope I was able to solve the mystery here
And if you want some more on du command, here is an article I wrote earlier:
omit the “s” - you will get a consisent result…
it’s not rocket science…
du -hc ~/somedir
du -hc ~
will give the same result
With du -shc
- the “s” means summary… means don’t check parent folder or further down…
You’re absolutely right, removing the “*” resolved the apparent inconsistency.
There is a hidden file, “.xsession-errors” that grows very fast, I don’t know why but I guess that is a topic for another discussion.
Thank you for your help.
Removing the “s” did not make any difference the way I issued the command, using the correct syntax as per my response to Abhisek did the trick.
But you’re right, it’s not rocket science , thank you anyway.
Glad you figured out the mystery.
Take a look at xsession error file and see if you see some error messages repeated frequently.