I find it unfair, to frequently call people “jerks” or whatever for whatever reason. I mean, some people are truly like that, but I’ve seen tons of people being called that, when they are not. They just have trouble communicating. Calling them jerks is more like calling someone sitting in a wheelchair “impolite” for not standing up, when a woman enters the room…
I’m not specifically talking about Linux Torvalds, as I don’t care about what he is saying and that’s why I don’t know much of what he said in his life. I barely listened to anything, he ever said.
However, considering the genius things he achieved in the software world, I would first assume, he has communication problems, as an extremely rational and techy person, because that’s often in our nature. That’s how we are.
Does not mean, he is an outright “jerk”, because of his lack of communication skills. The lack of this soft skill is maybe the price for his extremely high-end hard skills…
That said, I’ve heard a couple of years ago, that he actually apologised already for sounding like a jerk, sometimes. So, this makes it additionally unfair to again beat a horse for not speaking, when the reason it is not speaking is maybe because it’s not able to speak. Who knows. I don’t know, but I don’t like to assume the worst of people, by default.
I like to assume the positive interpretation of when people do something.
It’s the usual USA (land of the unfree) way to always assume the worst of people. Basically, most people in the US assume, that the average Joe is evil and just wants to kill everyone. This is the reason why gun laws are so permissive in most of the USA.
I wish, that people start thinking better of others. I especially wish for US Americans to not assume that everyone who puts their hand into their jacket or bag is pulling out a gun to shoot anyone…
RIP to everyone who died because of this shit.