Hi all,
I´m still not quite sure about the support philosophy of certain distros.
I´m talking about the fixed release model here, so not rolling releases or semi-rolling ones.
In the following I put the focus on Ubuntu and derivatives.
Inspired by a previous discussion (Question regarding /etc/apt/sources.list and support period - #28 by Rosika )
I am still wondering how different Ubuntu repositories (and those for derivatives) provide updates for packages.
I´ve been doing some research on the matter but essentially could come up with only a few minimum facts:
- Ubuntu and the other derivates all seem to use the same repositories.
- The only difference: Server and “normal” Ubuntu only use packages from the “main” and “restricted” branches, which are supported by Canonical for 5 years.
- All other derivatives come with packages from “universe” and even “multiverse”.
- By default, “universe” and “multiverse” are not active in Server.
Hmm …
I know that e.g. Lubuntu offers just 3 ys of support, but here there are “main”, “restricted”, “universe” and “multiverse” set as active, which makes the situation clear, I think. All in all: 3 ys. of support.
Another statement I found somewhere was:
So if you use Ubuntu [i.e. Ubuntu proper] and don’t install a single package from “universe” or “multiverse”, you have 5 years of support. Otherwise only 3 years.
I think I understand it on a general level, but I also found the information that the majority of packages (particularly those post-installed by the user) are from “universe”.
If that really is true … I cannot see why Ubuntu proper should be regarded as a distro which receives 5 ys. of support.
I mean: is there any realistic scenario of a user avoiding packages from “universe” completely on Ubuntu
Cos´ that would be the prerequisite for 5 ys, support, right?
Thanks a lot in advance for your help and opinions.
Many greetings from Rosika