What I found objectionable to your post was the wording, and to follow this up with the theft remark. To my mind this is not acceptable language for our community which is why I asked you to think about it. I would ask you again to think about it. I would also ask you again to carefully read all the posts made by her and look at the diagram she supplied. At no time did she say she was not paying for access only that she lived in a small time and could, with consent access her neighbours WLAN. I have further noted that while you say you do not know what a umts stick that a quick search would have told you what it was. Again I would kindly ask you if perhaps you have made a legal or moral judgement here and would think about it.
I am not having a go at you and I don’t want you to feel that. I am saying is that if I found your wording hard, then others would do so as well. This again is something I would ask you to think about . I hope this clears up my reasons why I replied as I did.