Based on arch linux so not an easy distro for new users, except for the dock along the bottom of the screen cannot see the big appeal, will stick with mint myself.
I thought you had already made your commitment.
Arch does not have to be difficult… Manjaro and Artix have tried to make it human compatable… not 100% successfully, but Artix is nearly there.
All Arch needs is a specially tailored DE… I think that is what SDesk is trying to do… if you like , put a Win DE on Linux.
@nevj
Based on Arch?? Would not call that as beginner-user-friendly?? Might give it a go on one of my laptops!! Wonder how many will opt for the $192.25 SDesk Physical Edition!!
Hi Daniel,
You would be the ideal one to tell us if it is a good Windows substitute.
My bet is it fails, like all other such attempts.
I missed the $192 bit. That is as expensive as Win.
Regards
Neville
Cant find it. It says Zorin works on computers up to 15 years old.
Agree, Zorin may be less difficult
All these attempts to put a Win frontend on Linux seem to flop… except Apple.
Wikipedia says this:
](Zorin OS - Wikipedia) It uses a GNOME and XFCE 4 desktop environment by default, although the desktop is heavily customized for users more familiar with Windows and macOS.[2][3]
That does not make sense… it cant have 2 default DE’s?
Last time I looked at Zorin - you could choose - i.e. a fairly vanilla style Gnome (like you get on Ubuntu, or Pop_OS (22) or Fedora) - a theme/style that makes it look like Windows 11, or a theme/style that makes it look and feel like MacOs…
I never spent long with it…
I do the latter on Ubuntu and Pop!_OS 22 - i.e. install MacOs style theming - icons, window control widgets, and move the window widgets to the left - and have Cosmic-Dock, or Ubuntu-dock/dash to look like the dock on MacOS… I have MacOS MacBooks either side of my Pop!_OS desktop and it helps to have most stuff looking consistent…
They’re not different DE’s - they’re just themed differently…
That is clearly a better approach, at least for ex MacOS users , but it does not come pre-setup..
Win is difficult… every release looks different. You could do something and it would look dated next year. That may be a strategy to counter imitators.
My draft Win imitators list seems to be
So they claim to provide a Windows-like desktop helping with the transition from Windows to Linux.
It´s not meant to be a lookalike per se. It´s still theLinux characteristics that shine through.
Hi Rosika,
Yeah, OK.
I think Lite fits after Mint… what do you think.?
I did not realise Lite tried to be Win transition friendly.
Mabe it belongs higher up on our beginners difficulty list too?
Well, they claim to be Win transition friendly. I have never considered this aspect.
To me it´s just another Linux distro.
Comment:
It´s already in the “easy” section, right after Solus.
I don´t feel I´d be able to be a good judge for your question as I have no experience with those higher-ranked OSes.
Perhaps we should leave it where it is right now. To me it seems quite alright.
True.
Once we discovered the best way to use a screen, that was it… everyone converged.
Like modern motor cars… they dont have the diversity of early manufacturers.
@nevj
Got the SDesk iso, put it on my ventoy usb, would not boot my Dell laptop!!! So I used Rufus and burned the SDesk iso to a usb and same results!!
I know Gentoo boots and runs well on the old Dell laptop and when I have time, that is what the laptop will be running!!!