For whatever reason, my good old reliable HP LaserJet no longer has drivers to make it work on Linux.
Tried three times with LinuxMint and again yesterday and today with KDE Neon.
Have installed it many a times before without issues.
Think HP is “driving” this broken issue…
Have you tried installing HPLIP? If it is already installed then delete it and re-install. Also,be sure to delete the config file, which is ~/.hplip/hplip.conf before you re-install. This will let you start with a clean slate.
This worked when my LaserJet decided to stop working.
Simply fed up with getting drivers for this HP Laserjet.
Delete that config file, removed HPLIP from the apps, rebooted, re-installed.
Still a no go.
Decided to try Titan Linux and same issue (error message).
Except for Solus, most other distros i’ve tried thus far have worked just fine at installing the driver.
If only a downloaded version of it could be found (like the one i found for Windows).
It’s an old printer… that’s why i’m shopping around for something usb connected that can work for Linux and Windows.
You could try Turboprint. A German company, not free, but not too much either. You get a license for life, for one computer, two printers, I believe. They have tons of drivers, you can contact them before you buy, to find out if they have the right driver. I’ve been using them for years with an old Canon MX 310. Print quality way much better then default Linux, using up less ink.
I use CUPS without a driver. A printer’s ability to interpret CUPS is part of the printer hardware - in existence since 2000’s. This was necessary if they wanted printers to function with Apple products. I don’t think it matters how old the printer is. But, you must be ready to do a lot of reading on the web.
P.S: Windows 10 is also using CUPS to connect to our Brother server. The problem is that I cannot find where their setup is. No one wants to answer this question on Windows 10 Forum. . . . More reading.
Can’t you just use it in emulated mode - or PCL generic driver?
I once had a HP colour laserjet, got it when XP was all the go… HP NEVER released 64 bit drivers for Windows 7… There was a 64 bit driver for Vista, that you could install, but when you printed, it would make the whole page black - this was obviously a conspiracy to drive customers to buy a new printer - HP are EXTREMELY guilty of this hideous planned obsolescence, which breaches lots of laws in civilized regions like the EU, but not barbaric backwaters like the USA or Australia…
Note - I can’t remember how we got around this limitation… Never was an issue in Linux though… I think I just used a generic “Laserjet” driver with it…
Think my days of distro hopping on Linux are over.
A.I. has finally put the hatch to my tryouts.
Took me a long while to find a driver (in Windows).
Tried everything and anything.
What i like so much about this 12+ year old printer?
doesn’t call homebase;
is a lot faster than the few most recent “smart” ones i’ve seen!
@danielson I had the same problem with a monochrome HP printer a couple of years ago when I first installed Mint Mate. I could not get the printer to work. I also tried Ubuntu Mate and the same thing happened so I changed to Mint Cinnamon and it worked fine. A friend of mine suggested that the Mate may not have the drivers necessary for Brother. I have no issues at all with Cinnamon.
Several experiences have shown, that just because a derivative is based on a popular and comparatively stable distribution, it does not imply that the derivative is just as stable. This is the reason why I wouldn’t blindly recommend Linux Mint over Ubuntu for beginners. Same for Artix. It’s just Arch Linux without systemd, right? Wrong. It’s much more unstable, has a lot more negative quirks, a lot more bugs & glitches, etc. If you switch from Artix to Arch, then suddenly so many things start working.
Therefore, if one wants maximum compatibility, one ought to use the popular base distributions, i.e. Ubuntu, Arch, etc.